> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > VC++ may be or not a good programming environment. I don't think > it is, but it > doesn't matter for what I'm trying to prove. Nothing in the > design of the CDK > forces Palm to go for a VC++ tied solution. CDK should allow > programmers to > choose between different programming tools. Because of price, if not for > anything else. I couldn't agree more. > VC++ can hardly be seen as a cheap tool. Some developers get VC++ > via their > companies (this is my case), but a lot of Palm developers are > hobbyists, who > may not afford or may not want to spend that kind of money. You can add me to that list. The price of the development environment, overhead of C++, and learning curve for C++ are all problems. GCC may not be as easy to use or powerful as CW, but it's free, and I can get by on it. I wish I had the same option for conduits. Tom
