How about this, after drawing the form?

LstEraseList(pLst);
LstDrawList(pLst);

-Sugho-

>From: Richard Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Custom draw list display problem
>Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:21:15 -0800
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > >How do I get the first item to be highlighted all the way
> > >across the first time, so that it behaves properly when the
> > >OS attempts to remove the highlighting?
> >
> > How is the first item getting highlighted? Are you setting it
> > to the list
> > selection? If so, when?
>
>Originally I had not been setting an initial selection, but
>the first item had been close-highlighted as I described.  Then
>I tried setting the initial selection in the InitForm routine,
>with no difference in the result.
>
>The previous suggestion (by Steve Sabram) of calling WinEraseRectangle()
>has gotten rid of -most- of the problem.  Now the highlighting
>to the right of the text is proper, but there's still a bit of
>junk to the left of the 1st after selecting a second.  Instead of
>
>        |[]ITEM 1[               ]|
>        |[ ITEM 2                ]|
>        |  ITEM 3                 |
>
>it's now this
>
>        |[]ITEM 1                 |
>        |[ ITEM 2                ]|
>        |  ITEM 3                 |
>
>Good enough ... but it'd still be nice to get rid of that last
>bit of "dirt".
>
> > >btw: is there any way to determine, when your list item drawing
> > >callback function is called, whether it is drawing a highlighted
> > >item or a "normal" item?  It seems as if the OS must set up the
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of. That's taken care of for you.
> >
> > I remember having this problem quite a while ago. I think the
> > answer might
> > be to draw the full list and then set the selection (then
> > maybe redraw the
> > list just in case).
>
>Force a redraw -- I'll try that, thanks.
>
>--
>-Richard M. Hartman
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to