"Michael S. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now &index clearly seems to indicate that an index is returned but > the "offset from the passed record index" is not obvious what that > means. In fact, it does not seem to mean the number within the category > at all. > > Why would it not just say that offset "is the index of the > record within the category"? Because it's not. You use offset of zero to iterate through all the records in a given category, passing in the index of the last record you found, and getting back the index of the next record in the category. -- Roger Chaplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
