This idea is not as clean as a "StrNPrintF" but it should certainly be
possible to calculate an upper bound for StrPrintF output under most
reasonable circumstances. Why not StrPrintF to a temporary buffer which is
big enough for this and then StrNCopy to the final destination?
Regards, Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Rezsonya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 1 January 2000 12:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: StrPrintF
the use of StrPrintF is quite nice, i have some message construction used
in a protocol and stuff, but i find it sorrowing that i can't utilize the
N. as an example, if i was to do strCat's or StrCopy's i can protect
myself more with StrNCat's and StrNCopy's, but there are no StrNPrintF's.
has anyone or does anyone have a good idea to use StrPrintF but have a N
equivilent (or any related call's?)
