i know that there at least one application that was a hack, and now (in a
new version) they made it stand-alone (this application is counting the time
spent on each application in the palm)
my guess that they get the trap of opening application, start to count, get
the trap for exiting application , stop to count.
so if another application will use these traps then the system will be
unsatable ?
or i'm missing something ?


Peter Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:4815@palm-dev-forum...
>
> The fundamental problem with directly setting the trap is how you clean up
> after yourself. You can store the old trap address and restore it when
> you're cleaning up (turning off the feature). However, what if the trap is
> patched by two different applications? In this case, if you're the second
> app to do the patching, your old address will actually be the address of
the
> first patch. If the first patch is turned off before yours, you'll end up
> turning the first trap back on.
>
> My understanding is that HackMaster was created specifically to deal with
> this problem, so hacks could be turned on or off in any sequence. Of
course,
> you still need to turn off a hack before deleting it. I think HackMaster
> takes into account the order in which hacks are turned on, so if multiple
> hacks patch the same trap, you can decide what happens first. I suspect
that
> most of the time, the result is the same regardless of the order.
>
>
>
>



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to