Steve wrote:
> May I ask why you don't want to use a read-only text field
> for you labels?
Two reasons:
1. It's *almost* working now with labels, it's very close (just off by a
few pixels). So why change to a field -- I'd rather understand what's
happening with the labels and fix it.
2. A couple weeks ago, Bob Ebert posted the following in regards to the
same topic (fields vs. labels):
"Fields take more memory from the dynamic heap. The field object is larger
and more complicated than a simple form label. The field text is allocated
dynamically as well. Drawing fields use more OS code, and more stack space.
(To handle the complexities of multiple lines, editing, etc.)"
So I'm going to spend a little more effort getting it to work with a label
before admitting defeat and switching to a field.
> However, it sounds like
> the approach you are taking should work.
Thanks, it almost seems like amount of pixels that I am off, is inversely
proportional to the length of the label. Hmm...
Joseph Koral
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
