Rus,

> I would have liked the Palm MiniIII or the Palm MiniV (could 
> be mIII or
> mV).  I guess there were too many suffixes on the Roman 
> numerals already...
> (Vx, IIIc, IIIe, VIIx, etc....)

How about if Palm got with the times and called it Palm MiniMe (Mini
Millennium Edition) :).

Mike McCollister

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nesse, Rustin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 7:38 PM
> To: Palm Developer Forum
> Subject: RE: Palm M100 Name Speculation
> 
> 
> I would have liked the Palm MiniIII or the Palm MiniV (could 
> be mIII or
> mV).  I guess there were too many suffixes on the Roman 
> numerals already...
> (Vx, IIIc, IIIe, VIIx, etc....)
> -Rus
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Steve Sabram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 2:39 PM
> >To: Palm Developer Forum
> >Subject: Re: Palm M100 Name Speculation
> >
> >
> >My swag at this is that it stands for "Mobile 100".  Or even 
> >more remedial, "Model 100" so it infers an entry level device?  I'm
> >surprised at the naming too since the last PDA with a "100" in 
> >the name was the original Newton.
> >
> >What I want to know more than name meaning is what progression 
> >naming of future products in this line will take.  Are we going to
> >have "m200" and "m500" products?  And when there is wireless 
> >service, are we going to note it such as "m100w" or just 
> "w100".  It is
> >stuff like this that image consulting is all about.  I'd love 
> >to have been in the room when they were deciding on "m100" and to go
> >with the lower case letter.
> >
> >Most of all, I'd like to know this since we amongst other 
> >hardware makers want to have some sort of name identity with 
> >products that
> >will connect into this unit and have the literature match.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >"McCollister, Mike" wrote:
> >
> >> Could it be that the Palm M100 is really the Palm 4?  Think 
> >of it, previous
> >> devices used decimal (the Pilot 1000 and 5000) and Roman 
> >numerals (the
> >> current crop of devices).  Now could Palm be using binary 
> >where 100 in
> >> binary is 4 in decimal?  I thinks so.  I also think that the 
> >"M" was placed
> >> in front of the number just to throw us off :).
> >>
> >> Mike McCollister
> >> maker of stupid Palm programs
> >>
> >> --
> >> For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to 
> >unsubscribe, please see 
> http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
> >
> >
> >-- 
> >For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to 
> >unsubscribe, please see 
> http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
> >
> 
> -- 
> For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to 
> unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
> 

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/

Reply via email to