> I was wondering if it is more efficient, in terms of file size, to set the
> copy prevention bit in codewarrior preferences, or use the
> ProtectOurDatabase function from the DrMcoy example.
smaller = set the bit. :) the attributes field exists whether you use it
or not, so, if you dont set it.. it's still taking up space (it just
contains a 0 instead of a 1).
putting the "ProtectOurDatabase" function means more code, and hence, a
larger executable - however, it can be used to reset the protection bit
if, by some chance (and it is possible) the user resets this bit :)
cheers
// az
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ardiri.com/ <--- free games!
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
