Hmmm...I wouldn't have thought that their being zero would be the problem.
Checking...
OK, this is goofy. In *some* versions of HotSync, it is considered an error for
the creation date to be more recent than the modification date. And in *some*
versions of HotSync, it is considered an error for the creation date to be zero.
I recently added a (non-fatal) check in Poser for the first condition. I'll add
one for the second as well. When installing a file with header data that is not
technically incorrect but that could cause HotSync to complain anyway, I'll put
up a warning.
-- Keith Rollin
-- Palm OS Emulator engineer
Lee Fyock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/12/2001 06:02:30 AM
Please respond to "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Lee Fyock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (Keith Rollin/US/PALM)
Subject: Re: Emulator, cool. Install tool, not.
Keith said:
>The last time I looked into this, the problem with the .prc file I was
>sent was
>that the embedded creation date was more recent than the embedded
>modification
>date. HotSync checks for that, but Poser doesn't.
That was it -- the creation and modification dates were being initialized
to 0.
Thanks!
Lee
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
