So the guy (Eisenman) ties them up in court while at the same time
going off to start a competitor?
In the article there he said something about not taking proprietary
information. Big deal, that's not the issue. The issue is business
practices.
Aren't there penalties for lawsuits of that nature? I mean, he must've
known that a letter of intent is not a contract, or he wouldn't be in
business. That was a harassment suit, pure and simple. I think
PalmGear should be awarded some percentage of everything
Handango has made (or an alternative minimum settlement if
Handango has not made any profit).
... although they may need to file a lawsuit to get any recompense.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
"Aaron Ardiri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:61229@palm-dev-forum...
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Richard M. Hartman wrote:
> > > 3) Handango is the source of all of the problems with PalmGear (the
> > > lawsuit). That is behind now. PalmGear can do nothing but go
> > > forward.
> >
> > For those who weren't aware of this lawsuit, could somebody
> > provide a brief summary of the issue?
>
> http://www.palmgear.com/news/shownews.cfm?resID=13232
>
> which links to:
>
>
http://www.dfwtechbiz.com/displayarticledetail.asp?art_id=48397&search=palmg
ear
>
> thats a start :P
>
> // az
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ardiri.com/
>
>
>
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
