Joe Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:95359@palm-dev-
forum:

> 
> --- Todd Walk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One thing you should not do is make the "demo" and "release"
>> versions the same, with just needing a code to activate it.
>> 
>> If you do this, then someone can crack your program the 
>> same day.  If the demo and release are different, then
>> at least one person has to pay up.
> 
> So, your motivation for writing and selling software is to get just 1
> person to pay for it?  Your unit price must be very high!  (Smiley face
> omitted, because it won't help if you don't already see this as
> humorous.)

Yup, that single $10 registration is my entire goal :-).

(My full time job is actually in EDA, and the full price of the
product I work on is $115K a copy!)

> 
> Maybe I'm just too lazy to create a separate "demo" and "release"
> version of my programs, but I figure there isn't much difference
> between having my software cracked the same day its released and having
> it cracked a few days or a week later.
> 

If it's a really popular program, nothing will help.  However, pirates
don't pay for programs.  Seperate versions makes it tougher for them to
get ahold of a copy unless one of them pays for it, or talks someone
into giving them a copy.  And people who actually pay for palm software
through ESD methods generally don't pass their software copies around.

This won't stop them, but if you combine it with regular upgrades, they'll
usually will be out of date and actually have to work to keep updated.
Since many pirates are just "collectors", they'll often just grab one 
version and then quit.  This means that anyone who copies from the pirate
will have an out of date version, and may become a potential customer
to get an up to date version.

Todd.

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/

Reply via email to