It would make more sense to have it over there if I were working on ARM-native versions of my apps. That's not the case... right now, I'm just trying to get my m68k apps working as they were before through PACE. If taking stuff over there better facilitates bringing questions about bugs and/or changes to their eyes, then sure.
Oh... I didn't realize you were reporting PACE problems on Cobalt... that makes more sense now.
The parameter block problem is puzzling then. According to the Cobalt docs, all 68K apps run in one PACE process and share a memory heap. I guess the core behavior is still the same -- there had been warnings already about using parameter blocks with embedded pointers, and it may be that you have two PACE instances running during a sublaunch. I'm not familiar enough with the new implementation to tell just yet.
-- Ben Combee, senior DTS engineer, PalmSource, Inc. Read "Combee on Palm OS" at http://palmos.combee.net/
-- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
