Hello Ben and John,
Thank you to have answered so fast.
You are certainly right.
I use prc-tools version 2.0, and the bug described look like mine.
I will download the new version and let you know if it works.
All the best
Ben Combee a �crit:
>
> At 11:27 AM 6/2/2004, you wrote:
> >Then the code which puzzles me :
> >
> >double ReturnDouble()
> >{ return 3.1416; }
> >
> >static void Go()
> >{
> >double d,e;
> >int i;
> >d=ReturnDouble();
> >i=(int)d;
> >e=(double)i;
> >...
> >}
> >
> >after this, the values of the variables are : d=3.1416, i=3, e=0 !!!
> >I don't understand why e cannot take the value of i.
> >
> >Any idea ?
>
> Is 'e' used in the code after the assignment? Could this be a situation
> where the optimized in GCC sees that e is unused, so it eliminates the
> assignment? At what optimization level are you building your code, and
> what version of prc-tools are you using?
>
> -- Ben Combee, DTS technical lead, PalmSource, Inc.
> Read "Combee on Palm OS" at http://palmos.combee.net/
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
