Chris,

I totally agree about open sourcing jsync. Then we could fix a few of the
irritating deficiencies and outright bugs in it. On top of that, you may
have noticed that there is no JSync support in OS 6 - only C/C++ and COM. :(

Ralph

"Chris Goller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Java conduits are relatively easy to write.  All conduits I've written
> have been in java.  However, there are a coupla problems.
>
> 1. Trying to delete one resource doesn't work Deleting all resources
> does work as a work around.
> 2. Their is a max size of records ( I don't remember what it was.)  It
> is the READ_SIZE variable in SyncManager.java.
>
>
> I have never had a problem were the conduit would not be called.  The
> conduit manager calls jsync13.dll that in turns calls the java conduit.
> The direct benefit of using java is the VAST number of classes that can
> be accessed.  There are http classes, image classes, etc that make the
> manipulation
> of data from the palm easy.  Before the flames begin, I know that you
> can do that in C++ (my day job).  However, java makes the development of
> sophisticated conduits that aren't simply copying of data to the desktop
> computer easy.
>
> The jsync stuff is now quite old.  Clearly palm has decided its not that
> important.  I think the hope was that with a java conduit the developer
> could have a cross platform
> (read mac) conduit.  Not so!
>
> So, using java for conduits really is a catch-22.  Though it is easier
> to extend the conduits capabilities, there appears to be no development
> on the platform.
>
> I would suggest to palm to make the source for the jsync13.dll available
> to us developers.  Why not open the source of a library that isn't being
> actively
> developed?
>
> Chris
>
>
> Henk Jonas wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> I can't seem to find any information about the development of jsync.
> >> Will
> >> there ever be a jdk 1.4 compatable version?  Is there a date set for
> >> this?
> >>  Does anyone recommend any alternatives?
> >>
> >> I have been using jsync for quite a while but I just upgraded my db
> >> software and now it is not 1.3 compatable so I am in a bit of a
> >> conondrum.
> >> thanks
> >> -ryan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I would suggest to switch to a conduit written in C++. In my opinion,
> > the jsync-stuff has no benefits over conduits in C++. But you have a
> > 10 MByte installation and sometimes weird effect, like your conduit
> > not called etc.
> >
> > Henk
> >
>



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/

Reply via email to