"Henk Jonas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > OK, that's your opinion. But to go for performance and lose compatibility > with future devices means to me that I would also need all current devices > to test my app on them. Which leads to much higher costs than booking a > flight to California. I try more to be compatible and OS friendly as > possible and can assume it will run once and everywhere and don't need to > test on every single device.
Henk, in looking back at my reply to your original post, I realize that it may seem like I was attacking you or your post in some way. That was not my intention, and if I offended you or made you angry then I do apologize. Sometimes my post writing style comes off a little too aggressive. Also, I do understand your position entirely, it's just that as a non-professional developer (at least in the PamOS community) I tend to do development that pleases me rather than the most commercially viable thing. Anyway, my point in my original post was just to try and guage the generally feeling of the developer community with regards to the apparent lack of Cobalt hardware, and to see if anyone was feeling disenfranchised in any way. Speaking for myself, I still feel like Cobalt is a winner and can't wait to get my hands on some real hardware. It's just disturbing to me to think that it might be a year and half before that happens... -Robert Hildinger -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
