>Dell? You're kidding right? You think the company that still hasn't sold an AMD-based PC is gonna start making Palm OS devices? Do you really think they'd put that strain on their >relationship w/ MS to make something for Palm OS? I'm sure of all the possible licensees, Dell is the one LEAST likely to not do it b/c of licensing fees and minimum sales contracts.


Why would using AMD processors put a strain on dell's relationship with m$?
I agree that much of Dell's success can be measured because of lower OS rates for windows from m$. However, the OS cost related to the hardware cost in PDAs and phones is much lower so I don't think m$ can put that much pressure on Dell. They could shave at most a few dollars off of the price.


If you don't like Dell than pick gateway or HP. I dont care. I was just making a point that palmsource needs to license their OS to whoever wants to build devices around it. PalmOne clearly hasn't sworn its allegiance to palmSource given some of its statements in the past 6 months. I would bet anything at least one of those 3 companies came to palm to licenses the OS and was turned down because Palm wanted to protect its current licensees. Protectionism doesn't work.

m$ primarily won the desktop OS war because it stayed out of the hardware business and licensed it's OS to anyone who wanted to build a whitebox. They are approaching the embedded/PDA market the same way.


-- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/

Reply via email to