Craig Likes wrote: > Didn't get this out of the article. In the article it > states a supported capability, it mentions nothing > that I can find on a requirement but I could have > missed something > > Nagel: We support a capability for signed code
True. And that IS an important distinction. But it's a capability the carriers would be crazy to pass up. Heck, they were probably the impetus for it to begin with. -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
