Don't know what all this noise about. I believe that any developer creating 
a commercial Palm program should try to make it compatible to at least OS 
3.5
Think about all those people who still have a M100 or M105

LionScribe


"Chris Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "Marvin Bellamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I'm going to need to port a Palm OS 4 application back to 3.5,
> specifically m105 handhelds.  I have a few questions about setting up my
> development environment since most 3.5 links I've found on Palm's site 
> seem
> to be dead:
>>
>> Where can I get the 3.5 SDK and can it be dropped into PODS?
>>
> You don't need to change SDK's.  They're all backwards compatible,
> in the sense that you target an older Palm OS version by limiting the
> API calls you make.  More recent SDK's can still be useful because
> (possibly) the Glue functions might have improved to provide support
> for functions that 3.5 doesn't support.
>
>> Are there any significant SDK changes between 3.5 and 4.0 that I
>> should look out for?
>>
> Depends on your app since many of the changes were hardware
> driven.  Connectivity APIs were added, extended and broken in
> different ways.  I don't remember whether the colour and hi-res
> stuff came in at 3.5 or 4 but I seem to remember changes to the
> way forms drew themselves.  The features documentation is a
> good indication of what OS version things were introduced.
>
> PalmSource don't document a lot of the API faults version-by-
> -version (this is, IMHO, the most significant deficiency in otherwise
> excellent documentation) so you've really got to test carefully and
> google for any strange results.  It's generally OK if you're targeting
> a specific device, but becomes a lot more complicated if you have
> to support a range of devices across 3.5 and 4.  Been there, done
> that, got the scars.
>
> Chris Tutty
>
> 



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please 
see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/

Reply via email to