On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:47:31 +0100 Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW: Wouldn't it make sense to add a feature to paludis that it > always puts itself on the top of the to-be-updated list (unless the > update of paludis itself would require explizit versions of other > packages to be installed first, of course)?
Possibly... The 0.26 resolver doesn't really have an easy way of doing that, but my local resolver can be given pretty much arbitrary prioritisation rules. It's something that might show up in a future release. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
