Starting to get it... So it is not a complete replacement. The dependencies can be solved by forcing a package. I just don't understand why not completing the task and replace all utilities... I am very impressed from the size of the paludis code base, it looks like that the missing pieces are relatively small.
Thank you, Alon. On 5/22/08, Steven Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > It is possible to run paludis without portage installed, but I wouldn't > recommend it. All of those wonderful tools like etc-update are worth > having around. Not to mention the huge amount of packages that have > portage as dep. > > > Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > | Hello, > | > | Trying to migrate into paludis... Some issues don't understand... > | > | Should it be a complete portage replacement? > | > | I mean, should it work if portage package is actually missing from > system? > | > | I am missing: > | ebuild > | quickpkg > | update-env > | update-etc/etc-update > | > | Also, is there some tool similar to: > | equery files, shows all files of a package. > | equery hasuse, all packages with specific USE flag. > | equery check, checks installed files. > | > | Also missing: > | eclean-dist > | > | I found the paludis-extras site, but if I understand correctly it is > | not formally supported. > | > | Thanks, > | Alon Bar-Lev. > | _______________________________________________ > | paludis-user mailing list > | [email protected] > | > http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFINXkDJAyGKGHTxmoRAqSdAJsGqWrkG2b2MXpSN5MFbX0nPOJ09QCfTQeg > B/jEnfOtBAFD3/NW+Kxk4IE= > =kBBC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
