>> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:41:45 -0400 (EDT) "Benjamin R. Haskell" <[EMAIL >>> PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Err... just realized update-eix is a hook. But, question remains, as >>>> I still don't really want the markers. >>> >>> And this is why we have markers for hooks. >>> >> >> <tongue_in_cheek reason="couldn't resist"> >> This seems like the opposite of why you have markers for hooks. I >> assume you don't have them because I don't want them. >> </tongue_in_cheek> >> >> The rationale makes sense -- distinguishing paludis output from hook >> output -- [...]
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Lord Drantin top-posted: > I think it was more of that you didn't realize it was a hook and thought > it was part of paludis, is why the markers are there That's what the "tongue-in-cheek" markup was meant to convey (that I understood the reason), but I couldn't resist poking fun at the ambiguity. (Knew I should've omitted the lame joke.) -- Ben _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
