On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:23:41 +0300
Dark_Dimius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main differences from bash are
> 1. you dont have to combine long commands, even if you want them to
> run like one. Just add them to sequence one by one and then install
> them.
> 2. If you want to find names of packages and then emerge them you
> dont need to keep the list in mind or in file, you can just enter like
> "search name1 {enter} <here will b the list of satisfied packages>
> install full_name1 {enter} search name2 {enter} <here will b the list
> of satisfied packages> install full_name2 {enter} ... and so on"
> 3. after you added them on you can run command "list" to see what will
> be dome if you run "run" and you can cancel only one action, what
> makes everything easier, at least for me.
>
> Yes, this all could be done using scrips, but it will make us rum
> paludis many times and it wont be optimal by time, also in my opinion
> it will be a great feature, making paludis more pleasant to use and
> will save time while constructing long package lists for install.Sounds like it's a job for a dedicated client. In any case, we're keeping the paludis client uninteractive, and when we do interactivity it'll probably be in the form of a GUI. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
