On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:25:11 -0500 (EST)
"Benjamin R. Haskell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Shouldn't cyrus-sasl have shown up in the "Reasons:" line for 
> dev-db/libpq? or is there some interaction between '--dl-upgrade 
> as-needed' and the fact that it was a dep for an installed package?

It should have shown up, but there're various reasons it might not.
Paludis doesn't go back and retroactively reresolve everything after it
changes its mind about which packages to select for install, so
sometimes reasons won't be shown when they should be.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
paludis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user

Reply via email to