On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:44:10 -0500 (EST) "Benjamin R. Haskell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sessions are something else. They're not related to reparenting. > > Interesting. I've not done a ton of work with low-level forking/etc, > so I didn't fully comprehend that. > > Nonetheless, the program I attached before still demonstrates the > problem, even with double-forking. And attached is an even more > minimal program that demonstrates the problem.
You're doing the double fork wrong. The program should immediately fork() upon startup, and the original process should exit without waiting for the child. That way the child gets reparented to init. > Sorry to beat a dead horse, but at this point I'm mostly curious for > future reference. Eh, it's only dying because I wasn't around much when the question first came up. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
