K. Haley posted on Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:14:50 -0600 as excerpted: > When I tested this in my arch vm the segfault was in g_free, and it > complained about a possible double free. It looks like the ownership > semantics of the image data changed, perhaps unintentionally. It's > fixed.
Yes, fixed! =:^) But now that I can actually see them using the new code without crashes... to answer your earlier question about whether it's inversed color... Yes, it's inversed/negative, at least for x-face. See that post from Adam I mentioned earlier, for instance. Some of those x-faces on the gmane.discussion group look pretty odd, ATM. =:^) but =:^( I'm not sure about face headers. Talking about face headers... in that group (gmane.discussion), it appears Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen (the guy running gmane, FWIW) has some sort of script for a rotating face header, so you can check a LOT of face headers "in the wild" by simply sorting by author, unthreaded, and viewing his posts. He doesn't rotate every post, but apparently every day or maybe every few hours. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
