BTW this is on osx tiger. I reverted to gcc 3.3 and pan compiled ok as usual.
Dave
On May 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Duncan wrote:
Duncan posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Sun, 01 May 2005 07:36:32 -0700:
Dave Chand posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 01 May 2005 09:36:09 -0400:
Has anyone tried to compile pan using gcc 4.0? Dave
[xposting to pan-devel from pan-user]
Hmm, that doesn't seem to have worked; either that or the devel list is
slower at responding...
Matter of fact, that's what I'm posting with right now!
Here's the updated patch. [snipped]
BTW, seems gcc4 breaks the sig recognition. Leastwise, it worked b4 and
it doesn't seem to now, even with my own posts which since it posted them
it /should/ recognize. So, there'll probably be another patch, at some
point, for that.
Of course, one can still select the desired text and followup, to get just
it, so I just do that and don't select the sig, or just delete the sig if
I forget.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/ rms_interview.html
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
