Frank Tabor wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:10 +0200, Per Hedeland wrote: > > >> Steven Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ >>> support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I do have >>> a couple of niggles. >>> >>> 1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded. >>> >> Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you mean >> "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131. >> >> --Per Hedeland >> > > I believe he means filtered articles. > > Ok to clarify, I mean saved. I select a bunch of articles and select save to disk. They don't get marked as read as they are saved, in older Pan 1.x versions they did
Steve _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
