On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:35:24 -0400, Keith Richie wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Jim Henderson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:22:43 +0000, walt wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:57:12 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote: >> > >> >> Other times, pan prompts me to save the image rather than viewing >> >> it; if I right-click the message in the header pane, I can select >> >> "read message" and it'll display properly.
>> > ...the decision is >> > based on the type of attachment, the number of lines in the >> > attachment, and the name of the newsgroup.... > In this case, it doesn't have anything to do with the number of lines, > nor attachment type. The post in question has 7044 lines with a .jpg > attachment. In the same group there is a 23841 line jpg which can be > read without being prompted for download... Interesting, I never noticed before that pan cares about the size of the *parts* of the image, which in this particular case is 23841 lines divided by five parts, thus making each part less than 5000 lines. I'd have to consider that a bug, actually :o) _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
