Hi,
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:33:56 -0600, "K. Haley" wrote: >[…] > Second, here are the updated tests for converting subject lines to > paths. Yes you use %s in the path spec. Also the help button in the > save dialog lists the available replacements. >[…] I got your latest testing branch running here. I had been running the patches in bug #403797, now your repo has a 'better' version of it. Then I tell Pan to use %g/%s in the path to save any thing. No matter what version of this bug/patch, we still see some minor glitches it produces. Often, the poster's Subject line will cause a saving of the files into two slightly different subdirs. For example: If you go to alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.new-age and try saving the Windham Hill (VA) - A Celtic Season collection (freshly posted), we get the nfo file separated off into a slightly longer %s name as, Windham_Hill_(VA)_-_A_Celtic_Season_NMR_-_00 and the rest of the files are in a slightly shorter %s name as, Windham_Hill_(VA)_-_A_Celtic_Season_NMR which I think should be the real one to use. There are other instances using this patch that causes each file to be saved into its very own %s, despite the similar Subject lines for every post. In this case it might be better to leave-off the %s entirely. ;) (Right now I have no direct examples to demonstrate this.) I see this as minor glitches, because it is simple to use 'mv' to rake the related files together as a collection. I just thought you might like to know. :) _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
