Petr Kovar posted on Fri, 04 Aug 2017 22:35:50 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:20:17 +0000 (UTC)
>> Detlef Graef posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:56:25 +0200 as excerpted:
>> > Am 30.07.2017 um 05:24 schrieb Duncan [quote killed]
>> > You are using Pan 0.143:
>> > User-Agent: Pan/0.143 (Quaint little villages here and there;
>> > b4329315c)
>> > Are you using secure connections? Do you noticed any issues?
>> Unfortunately, no secure connections (yet).
>> My "bread and butter" use of pan is for gmane [...] which last I
>> checked was no longer doing TLS connections after the ownership
>> transfer, so I had to reset gmane to unencrypted. =:^(
> Duncan, gmane via port 563 works fine here for me, try it on your side.
> Maybe they just reintroduced that feature?
Thanks for the prod. I can confirm that 0.143's working with TLS now on
"Last I checked" was actually just a few days after the move, when I got
tired of no gmane updates because TLS apparently /wasn't/ up again yet.
But that has of course been... at guess without checking, about a year
ago now, and obviously some time in there they fixed it. =:^)
So yes, they "just" reintroduced, but "just" is relative, and could
actually have been months ago, for all I know anyway.
Thus as I said, thanks for the prod. It's working now, both with the
"new" gmane code (which might actually be months old by now), and with
the new pan code. =:^)
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
Pan-users mailing list