Both sound like good ideas to me


________________________________
 From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
To: Ubuntu Papercuts Ninjas <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013 11:58 PM
Subject: [Papercuts-ninja] I'm still here :)
 

Sorry I've not been very active here over the past month or two. Real life has 
conspired to drag me by the scruff of my neck over to other things it deems 
more important, so I've not had a lot of time for paper cuts :(

I'm hopeful that this week will be the end of all that and I can get back into 
this. I've got some ideas that I've come up with during this downtime that I've 
not had time to do anything about, so if anyone's interested in kicking things 
off, here they are:

== Review all the closed paper cuts (those marked as invalid) ==
One of the things that came up early on was that a lot of paper cuts were being 
closed because of a (mine) very strict interpretation of the definition of a 
paper cut. That means there's a lot of potentially very good paper cuts in this 
list of over 1500 closed reports.

== Work with the bug squad to find new paper cuts ==
The bug squad have regular events called 'hug days', where they all get 
together and give a particular package a hug. On these days, they go through 
the entire list of bugs and make sure they're getting some attention. We could 
work with them on these days when they're looking at packages that affect us - 
if they forward us potential paper cuts then we can help triage the bug in 
Ubuntu.

How does this sound to people? Got any ideas of your own?

Chris
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to