Have a *look* at the "remaining actions" page
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts%20will%20make%20Ubuntu%20shine/Remaining%20actions>,
and you will see this item:
[o] I reduce the definition of papercut to not include reports
where the affected package is "Linux".
This is because these reports are *difficult* to be improved, triaged or
fixed for non experts; and doing any of this phases wrong will have
*worse consequences* that what is normal*
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/kernel>, making the bug fix
process much longer.
Regards Dario ?
El 10/11/13 13:27, Dario Ruellan escribió:
I am willing to bring this bug into the project scope:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/765438
It is a critical flaw reported about two years ago. Upstreams says it
is fixed, but I'm not sure why Ubuntu's team has still not patched it.
It is something that a Papercut Ninja cannot fix, since it can
compromise the core.
Is it too far fetched for the scope of the project?
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~papercutters
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~papercutters
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
