Mon Sep 19 05:55:44 2016: Request 117955 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by jplesnik
       Queue: Module-ScanDeps
     Subject: LICENSE does not agree with lib/Module/
   Broken in: 1.22
    Severity: (no value)
       Owner: Nobody
      Status: new
 Ticket <URL: >

Module-ScanDeps-1.22 has weird license declaration. While LICENSE file quotes 
Artistic 2.0 license, lib/Module/  (and other module) files declares 
"same terms as Perl itself" and that means GPL+ or Artistic 1 (see

The current wordings implies that lib/Module/ (and other module) 
files are covered by GPL+ or Artistic 1 licenses and the other files like 
wip/ are covered by Artistic 2.0 license.

Is that really what the author wants?

Reply via email to