> ... > > So I am not against extending GNU Parallel with that, but since: > > * I do not personally need the change > * The change is significant with a risk of breaking/slowing existing code > > then I will not personally make the patch for this. In other words: If > I receive a patch and this patch does not break/slow down existing > code, then I will look favorably at it.
Sounds reasonable. Thanks for taking the time to look into it. I'll see how far I can get just using time etc for now...it's a bit messier that way, but probably easier than extending parallel.
