On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen <traxpla...@gmail.com> wrote: > try remove the -j +0 parameter.
If I am not wrong, "-j +0" should be the same thing as no -j, right? But just in case, testing without -j the problem is exactly the same: a large amount of memory usage and no processing at all.
