On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Rasmus Villemoes <r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25 2015, Ole Tange <o...@tange.dk> wrote: > >> How about: >> >> --halt 2,25% == --halt 25%,2 : > While at it, it would probably be nice to avoid the magic numbers > (though they'd probably need to stick around for > compatibility). Something like > > --halt on-fail,25%,no-cleanup (aka --halt 2,25%) > --halt on-success,50%,cleanup (aka --halt -1,50%) > --halt on-fail,cleanup (aka --halt 1) > --halt never (aka --halt 0)
I agree with your observation on magic numbers, but I really do not like these long names. I would also like if we could re-use terminology from something existing, so that there would be some familiarity with with the concept already. /Ole
