Dominik Szczerba wrote:
Actually that was never clear to me in GPL in general. If I develop something for in-house use only then there is nobody to give my code to. But the code is potentially employed for commercial purposes (including generation of income) so it IS being used as a commercial tool, only not distributed.
There is a common misconception here ... the GPL does not make any distinction between commercial / non-commercial usage. The only thing that matters when you're dealing with the GPL is distribution: if you distribute your derived work (outside your company), you must do so using a GPL-compatible license. If you don't distribute, you don't have to do anything.
Cheers, Tim -- Timothy M. Shead Data Analysis & Visualization (1424) Sandia National Laboratories 505-284-0139 _______________________________________________ ParaView mailing list [email protected] http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
