Benjamin
What happens if you do this...
class vtkMyFilter: public vtkUnstructuredGridAlgorithm
//BTX
, public myThreadedFilter
//ETX
I think I've used that trick before (or something similar, I'll check).
If that doesn't remove the offending method instantiation, then why not
simply define a dummy method in your vtk class (as long as it is linked
in, it should be ok).
int vtkThreadedFilterCommand(vtkClientServerInterpreter*,
vtkObjectBase*, const char*, const vtkClientServerStream&,
vtkClientServerStream& resultStream)
{
return 1 or 0;
}
JB
Obviously, such a function is defined for every base class - but the
one above does not exist because vtkThreadedFilter is not wrapped. The
easy solution would be to wrap vtkThreadedFilter, but this requires
the definition of the New, SafeDownCast etc macros like in every other
vtk object. However, since vtkThreadedFilter is not a vtk Object by
themselves, it does not have a vtk baseclass and therefore, I cannot
declare the macro vtkTypeRevisionMacro.
Is there a simple solution to this mess?
Thanks
Benjamin
_______________________________________________
ParaView mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
--
John Biddiscombe, email:biddisco @ cscs.ch
http://www.cscs.ch/
CSCS, Swiss National Supercomputing Centre | Tel: +41 (91) 610.82.07
Via Cantonale, 6928 Manno, Switzerland | Fax: +41 (91) 610.82.82
_______________________________________________
ParaView mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
