Um.. well I just put in a bug report the removes the Carbon framework
from linker flags in the FindQt4.cmake file. Wonder if that was really
necessary. I just assumed that if I want a true 64 bit build then
Carbon would hold me back on that.
I guess, how do we know if we get a true 64bit build of Qt4.5 and
ParaView then? I guess if the compile succeeds that is the first step.
I don't actually have a 64 bit machine (yet) but hopefully by the end
of the month I'll have one of those swanky Core i7 Xeons that just got
release on tuesday.
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson [email protected]
www.bluequartz.net
On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Sean McBride wrote:
On 3/4/09 8:49 AM, Clinton Stimpson said:
Thanks, I'll try to take a look at it.
Also reported issue http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8671
against the FindQt4.cmake file. Patch is attached to the bug.
Synopsis: The Carbon framework is being added to the link line
when it
should not when Qt4.5 built with Cocoa is found.
I didn't change that because qmake still adds the -framework Carbon
compile flag for a Cocoa based Qt. At least that's what I saw in the
beta and rc1.
I'm not sure why it still does.
Not all of Carbon.framework is deprecated, and much of it is available
in 64 bit too. Maybe they need parts of it even for their Cocoa
version?
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng [email protected]
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
