I like the suggestion of giving better names to the inputs. I have always disliked how confusing Input and Source are. If I remember correctly, it is backwards because I changed it to be more compatible with some other filter, maybe stream tracer? What about Source and Target? Does that make it clear that we are probing the data from the source to the geometry on the target?
-berk On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Stephens, Michael M ERDC-ITL-MS <[email protected]> wrote: > in the "for what it's worth" file: > > is it just me or does the "Resample with Dataset" filter in paraview have the > "Input" & "Source" items backwards from the vtkProbe documentation. > > looking at the Resources/filters.xml it looks backwards there too. > > the "Input" is tied to the SetSource command and the "Source" is tied to the > SetInput command. > > also if anyone is still reading, why not label these with something actually > descriptive > as "Input" and "Source" map to very similar things in most people's heads. > > how about: > > "Probe Geometry" and "DataSet to probe" > > > "feed your head" --- the doormouse > > -m > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
