You are correct - I misunderstood. This is indeed a new bug. Alan
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Doria Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:48 AM Cc: ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] default glyph size On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Scott, W Alan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is bug number 5659. Frankly, this has been a topic of debate for a while, since the solution is not trivial. The problem is that ParaView creates a good scale for your glyph, using data from time step 0. But, at time step 1, the data can be totally different. For instance, if you use displacement from time step 0, displacement will be very near zero for time step 0, and (relative to time step zero) orders of magnitude larger for time step 1. The same problem occurs with setting colors for variables, as well as 2d plot scales. One option is to start using the last time step to create these scales, realizing that this will slow down the initial load times of large data. Alan Alan, I don't follow. There is only time 0 in this example, so shouldn't the scale be well defined and constant? Bug 5659 seems to be dealing with the problem of glyph sizes not updating properly, this is dealing with them not being correct from the beginning. David
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
