We've been using the distributed stream tracer to generate 100s-1000s of
stream lines per time step. It's very slow, and it doesn't scale at
all. The class comments say as much. I'm sure there is a reason why
this implementation was chosen. Is there something that generally
prevents real parallel implementation? Is there a better implementation
available out there?
There is this post a while back
http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2009-July/012959.html
What's the status?
Thanks
Burlen
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
