Can you post an example dataset? Just the xmf file would be sufficient. -berk
2009/8/31 weaponfire2005 <[email protected]>: > > > > > ---------- 转发邮件信息 ---------- > 发件人："weaponfire2005 <[email protected]>" > 发送日期：2009-08-31 19:05:42 > 收件人："Andy Bauer" <[email protected]> > 主题： Re:Re: [Paraview] Paraview store all data in every server node? > Hi: > I used vtkXdmfReader to read my data(ParaView version is 3.4.0), and I > also found some information about my problem(XDMF bad memory use) from > the mail list. But I didn't find a final resolution for it. > My problem is, for example: > run: mpirun -np 4 ./pvserver > after reading data and rendering isosurface, each > node(process) consume 2GB memory > and run: mpirun -np 16 ./pvserver > after reading data and rendering isosurface, each > node(process) also consume 2GB memory > For this problem, I could't visualize large-scale dataset. Because if a > dataset could be visualized by one node, It also could be visualized by 16 > nodes, but if it could't be visualized by one node, it also could't by 16 > nodes(or more). > Maybe I should try ParaView 3.6.1. I will cry if the problem still exist > in version 3.6.1...... > 在2009-08-30，"Andy Bauer" <[email protected]> 写道： > > The problem may be the reader that you're using. Some of the readers in VTK > are not parallel so even if you run multiple processes each process will > still try to load the entire dataset in that case. > > Andy > > 2009/8/30 weaponfire2005 <[email protected]> >> >> Hi all: >> First thanks for Dave.Demarle's help. >> I use "mpirun -np 4 ./pvserver" to launch a server with four >> nodes, visualizing a 800*800*300 grid. It seems that each process consume >> too much memory. So I extend the number of nodes from 4 to 8 using "mpirun >> -np 8 ./pvserver" , but each process on 8 nodes server consume the same >> memory as 4 nodes server. The situation of 16 processes(16 nodes) is same as >> above. >> I thought that with the number of processes' growth, each process on >> server would share less raw data, so the quantity of memory each process >> consuming would decline. It proved that I was wrong. Could someone tell me >> the reason? >> Thanks for your help:) >> Pan Wang >> >> >> ________________________________ >> 没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> > > > > ________________________________ > 没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net > > ________________________________ > 没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
