Hmmm. I wonder this is somehow ghost level related. Do you have a dataset and an example pipeline that demonstrates the problem?
-berk On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jean M. Favre <[email protected]> wrote: > > I could not find any test for IntegrateAttributes, and I am questioning > the output generated when run in parallel, on a 2D surface mesh. > Although the area computed is equal to the area computed by the serial > builtin paraview, some other variables (but not all) show large > differences in integrated values. The results depend on the number of > processors used as well. > > I have tested with some physical data which we have validated and the > serial integrations are correct. The parallel runs are not. > > I have also tested with some simple Wavelet data, and by using a D3 > before the integration filter, insuring that cells were assigned uniquely. > > My questions are: How are the results of IntegrateAttributes validated? > Is there a test somewhere? What about parallel runs? > > Thanks for any tips. > > Jean-- > Swiss National Supercomputing Center > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
