Hmmm. Strange. They use the exact same traversal mechanism. Can you send me a dataset? I will put it in our list of issues to check.
-berk On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jean M. Favre <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a MB dataset of 4 objects, each block being itself a multi-block > dataset. The first MB is a composite object of vtkStructuredGrids, while > the last 3 are again multi-blocks, each one a composite of > vtkStructuredGrids. This is not AMR, just a complex geometry, cleanly > separated into functional objects. > > Well, ArrayCalculator does not handle that well. It produces the same > hierarchy, but most objects have empty data fields, except for the first > MB (at the lowest level), of the last MB at the first level. > > Is it possible that the traversal of a multi-composite object does not > quite fully visit all leaf objects? Yet, if I slice the multi-composite > object, I get the correct multi-composite slices. So, is there something > particular to the ArrayCalculator? > > Jean-- > Swiss National Supercomputing Center > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
