So you're saying that if I don't embed any manifest (which the IDE does by default) into the plugins it should just work?
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Clinton Stimpson <[email protected]>wrote: > > Can you fix that issue some people might have by not embedding the > manifests > into the plugin dlls, where embedding them is the default behavior? > > Clint > > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 03:58:54 pm Dave Partyka wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have tracked down the issue. That being an inconspicuous Visual Studio > > Security update > > (KB971092< > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/info.aspx?na=49&p=1&SrcDisplay > > >Lang=en&SrcCategoryId=&SrcFamilyId=294de390-3c94-49fb-a014-9a38580e64cb&u=ht > >tp%3a%2f%2fsupport.microsoft.com%2f%3fkbid%3d971092> ) that was installed > > sometime after I did the 3.6.1 release. Binaries built with that patch > > applied appear to not run on older revisions of XP (SP2). Thus, I have > > uninstalled the update, rebuilt ParaView 3.6.2 and uploaded the > regenerated > > binary to the download server. I have verified that it does work on a > clean > > SP2 machine BUT you must either install the Visual Studio runtime > > redistributable (simple) > > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4AB7 > >-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en > > > > OR copy the runtime dlls (Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest, msvcm90.dll > > msvcp90.dll msvcr90.dll) distributed with ParaView into each plugin's > > folder (ugly) in order to get plugins to work. > > > > Any one using an up-to-date Windows XP or newer (Vista,7) should be able > > to disregard these directions. > > > > > > Please report and further issues relating to this and thank you for the > > feedback! > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Robert Maynard > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > When you profile ParaView does the main executable and plugins load > the > > > same MSVC dlls. ( F9 shows full paths of loaded dlls ). > > > > > > If they don't load the same dlls, comparing the manifest files will > > > determine if the problem is two different versions of the MSVC are > being > > > used. > > > > > > > > > Moreland, Kenneth wrote: > > > > > > Um, sure. What specifically would you like me to report? > > > > > > -Ken > > > > > > > > > On 1/5/10 4:46 PM, "Robert Maynard" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Would you be able to run dependency walker, and report back the > results? > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > I tried adding the runtime redistributable. The plugins now load > without > > > complaint, but they do not work. The SLAC tools plugin does not create > a > > > toolbar like it is supposed to. The point sprite plugin does not > create > > > the “Point Sprite” representation to the representation combo box. The > > > VisIt reader plugin allows you to open .silo files, but they always end > > > up with empty data. > > > > > > Does anyone have an idea why that is? Could it be using two different > > > sets of MSVC libraries? > > > > > > -Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/5/10 3:11 PM, "Dave Partyka" <[email protected] < > > > http://[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > The best you can probably do if you're stuck at SP2 is install the > > > runtime redistributable. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4A > > >B7-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <[email protected] < > > > http://[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Given that, is there some advice you can give for installing the MSVC > > > classes on Windows XP stuck at SP 2? How do you do that (without > > > installing the entire compiler)? > > > > > > -Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/5/10 1:45 PM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <[email protected] < > > > http://[email protected]> <http://utkarsh.ayachit@ > kitware.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Another option would > > > > > > > > be for ParaView to do a silent install of the MSVC redist package > > > > instead > > > > > > of > > > > > > > dumping the dll's/ > > > > > > Actually that might not be a bad idea. We can even make it a option > > > that the user can uncheck, if he wants. Maybe we should look into that > > > for 3.8. > > > > > > Utkarsh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **** Kenneth Moreland > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories > > > *********** > > > *** *** *** email: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> < > > > http://[email protected]> > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919 > > > *** web: > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>< > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **** Kenneth Moreland > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories > > > *********** > > > *** *** *** email: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919 > > > *** web: > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel>< > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **** Kenneth Moreland > > > *** Sandia National Laboratories > > > *********** > > > *** *** *** email: [email protected] > > > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919 > > > *** web: > > > http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel<http://www.cs.unm.edu/%7Ekmorel> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
