There is no reason why it should be optional. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Dave Partyka <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the duplicate email, including the ParaView lists as well, > > Hi all, > A bug a user found with the latest ParaView binary led me to discover that > building the OpenFOAM reader is optional. Is there any reason this should > be? If not, does anyone object to me removing the CMake option and just > having it always built? > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Paraview-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers > > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
