Finally, I found a bug opened 6 months ago: http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=10125 I added a note. I hope that it will interest some PV gurus
Jerome 2010/6/2 Jérôme <[email protected]>: > Dear all, > > I fill very surprised that *nobody* has to resample some data inside > ParaView. Several threads deal with enabling some VTK filters in > ParaView that actually change the extent of the input image (just as > vtkImageResample), but when the output extent is higher that input, > there is a strange behaviour. Sorry for being lazy: the problem was > described in the following threads. > http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2010-May/017309.html > http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2009-October/014306.html > http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2009-April/011945.html > > Please, tell me if I am doing something wrong in the XML, if I am > stupid, if this is a known limitation of ParaView, if I am not sending > to the right mailing list, if [put your own proposition]. > > Thanks for all, and best regards. > Jerome > > PS: you can find the incriminated XML files here: > http://github.com/jeromevelut/Peavip . Beware of the Spline Filter, > another pending request has been sent. > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
