Hello,
thanks for the info!
Is my impression correct, that in version 3.8.1 the python trace state
process is not as 'complete' as using the old state file approach?
For my case setup, e.g. there is not always the correct camera position
and the correct slices...
Best Regards!
Fabian
On 01/24/2011 08:13 PM, David E DeMarle wrote:
That page is ancient.
I think PVFWrap was the predecessor to paraview.simple which since 3.6
is the standard way to do ParaView python scripting (see python
trace).
The comments about paraview state files being too verbose have been
addressed since then as well.
Or did you mean something else?
David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x109
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Fabian Braennstroem
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I just found this page and wonder, if this will be a new approach for python
scripting:
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/index.php/Visualization_Script_Examples#Paraview_Python_Script_with_PVFWrap
In addition, there are comments about the VisIt way... do you plan something
like this!?
Best Regards!
Fabian
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
