Hi Aurélien, I found the bug. Very soon I am pushing my changes to VTK and hopefully by this evening I can update VTK reference in ParaView.
Thanks again for reporting this. Best Regards, Aashish 2011/3/30 Aashish Chaudhary <[email protected]>: > Hi Aurélien, > > I did confirm that it is slow now (5 times slower with a sphere having > a million points on my linux 64 system). I will see if I can fix it > soon (first need to find the reason). > > Thanks for reporting this. > > Aashish > > > 2011/3/30 Aurélien Marsan <[email protected]> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I perform some calculations in Paraview, through a ProgrammableFilter in >> which I use several vtk.vtkArrayCalculator objects that I connect between >> each other with GetOutputPort and GetInputConnection. >> >> In the 3.8.1 release of Paraview, such a calculation on a grid with 1.5e6 >> points need roughly 3 or 4 seconds. >> In the 3.10.0, using the same tool (an external module, writen in python, >> that I import into the programmable filter), it takes 6 or 7 times longer. >> >> Is there some explanation ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Aurélien >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> > > > > -- > | Aashish Chaudhary > | R&D Engineer > | Kitware Inc. > | www.kitware.com > -- | Aashish Chaudhary | R&D Engineer | Kitware Inc. | www.kitware.com _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
